What is an Attractive Nuisance in Texas Law?

Children love pools, no doubt about it. And most pool owners do the right thing; they fence them off, secure access, and work to keep kids safe. But what happens when a pool is left unfenced, and a child wanders in? Under Texas law, when something dangerous on private property like a pool, construction site, or trampoline, attracts a child and causes injury, the property owner may be legally responsible. This is known as the attractive nuisance doctrine, and it plays a major role in premises liability cases in Texas.

Here is what parents, property owners, and injury victims need to know about attractive nuisance law in Texas.Defining the attractive nuisance doctrine

Defining the attractive nuisance doctrine

So, just what is an “attractive nuisance”? In Texas, the attractive nuisance doctrine is a legal rule that can hold property owners liable if a child is injured by a dangerous condition or object on their land, especially if that condition was likely to attract children.

Importantly, this rule can apply even if the child was trespassing. The key idea here is that children are naturally curious and often do not understand risks the way adults do. Given that, if a property owner has something on their property that might draw in a child – say, a trampoline – and that thing poses a risk, the owner may have a legal duty to either make it safe or restrict access.

This premises liability principle has existed for well over a century and has since expanded to include modern hazards like swimming pools, construction sites, and old machinery.

Looking for a personal injury lawyer near you in Houston, TX?

We’ll fight for the compensation you deserve.

Send Us a Message Call us

Common examples of attractive nuisances

While nearly anything could potentially be considered to be dangerous in the wrong context or circumstance, courts have recognized certain types of hazards are especially attractive to children. Common examples include:

• Swimming pools: Drowning in a swimming pool is, sadly, a top cause of accidental child deaths in Texas. Unfenced or unguarded pools are classic attractive nuisances.
• Playground equipment and trampolines: These can be particularly risky, especially when not properly maintained or secured.
• Abandoned vehicles or appliances: Curious children may climb inside and become trapped or injured.
• Construction sites: Open trenches, tools, scaffolding, or loose debris can look like a playground to a child. Property owners have a legal responsibility to secure these hazards. Even collapsing roofs are not uncommon.
• Unsecured ladders or rooftops: Children love to climb, right?  As such, these things can quickly lead to serious falls if access is not blocked off.
• Animals: Aggressive dogs and other sorts of dangerous animals can seem harmless to a child, but even a seemingly tame pet can pose a risk if it is known to bite or act unpredictably.

Legal responsibilities of property owners

Under the attractive nuisance doctrine, an owner has a legal duty to keep their premises reasonably safe and they may be held liable for a child’s injury if certain conditions are met. Generally, liability applies when:

• There is a condition or object on the property that is likely to attract children.
• That condition poses an unreasonable risk of serious harm.
• The child, due to their age, did not recognize the danger.
• The property owner knew or should have known that children might trespass.
• The burden of eliminating the danger or restricting access is slight compared to the risk involved.

Note: Again, for the attractive nuisance doctrine to apply, the child can even be a trespasser; he or she need not be invited or have legal permission to be on the property. Texas courts recognize that children often wander onto private land out of curiosity, especially if something tempting is both visible and easily accessible.

Exceptions and defenses

Not every injury involving a child on private property will lead to liability. Property owners have several defenses they may raise. One common defense is that the danger was open and obvious, meaning that even a child should have understood the risk. For example, say that a child climbs onto a roof using a clearly visible ladder but later falls. A court may find that the danger of falling was obvious, even to a child, and in a case like that the law might not impose liability.

Another defense involves reasonable precautions. If the property owner took appropriate steps to secure the hazard, such as installing a fence or locking up equipment, they too may not be held liable, even if an injury occurred. Other defenses that a property owner might assert are:

• That the child was old enough to understand the danger, or
• That the hazard was not, in fact, something likely to attract children.

Ultimately, liability under the attractive nuisance doctrine in Texas depends on the facts: The age of the child, the nature of the hazard, what the property owner knew, and what they did (or did not do) to prevent harm.

Texas-specific considerations

While Texas does recognize the attractive nuisance doctrine, how it is applied can vary depending on the details of the case. For instance, one key factor in Texas is the age and maturity of the child. The younger the child, the more likely a court is to find that they did not understand the danger and therefore needed protection under the law. On the other hand, older children who can likely appreciate the risk of, say, an open pool or a barking dog, may not be afforded those same legal protections.

Another important factor is whether the property owner knew, or reasonably should have known, that children were likely to trespass on the premises. For example, if a backyard with a visible trampoline borders a neighborhood park, it may be “foreseeable” (i.e., predictable) that local children could be tempted to enter. In that scenario, Texas courts could find that the property owner had a duty to take extra precautions, such as locking the gates or adding fencing.

Courts also consider what steps, if any, the owner took to secure the property. A warning sign alone is usually not enough, especially if the hazard is located in a place like a warehouse, where a child may not be able to read the sign or understand what it means. The law expects owners to take reasonable steps to prevent children from accessing a known hazard.

Ultimately, whether a property owner in Texas is liable under the attractive nuisance doctrine depends on a careful balancing of foreseeability, the child’s understanding, the nature of the hazard, and what the owner did (or failed to do) to prevent injury.

What to do if your child is injured by an attractive nuisance

If your child is hurt due to a dangerous condition on someone else’s property, it is important to act quickly. Here are the key steps to take:

1. Seek medical care immediately.
2. Take photos or videos of the hazard as soon as possible.
3. Do not speak with the property owner’s insurer until you consult a lawyer.
4. Save all medical records, witness statements, and reports.
5. Talk to a Texas premises liability lawyer who understands attractive nuisance cases.

These cases can be complex, especially when they involve large property owners or insurance companies. The good news is that at Armstrong Lee & Baker LLP, we know how to investigate, build, and win these claims.

Contact our Houston premises liability lawyers. If you think your child was injured by an attractive nuisance in Texas, do not wait. Call us at (832) 793-8033 or send us a message online for a free consultation. We are committed to helping families get justice and holding negligent property owners accountable.

C.J. Baker

C.J. Baker represents victims with serious injuries and he won’t let any corporation or insurance company stop his clients from getting complete justice. He has won millions of dollars for victims of 18-wheeler crashes, oilfield equipment failures, offshore platform explosions, and defective medical devices. Our lawyers have 25+ years of combined experience.

Awards & Accolades

Get in touch with C.J. Baker now.