American Bottling Company Workers’ Compensation Claims

American Bottling Company Workers’ Compensation Claims can often catch injured employees off guard, particularly when the employer is a non-subscriber under Texas law. Unlike traditional workers’ comp protections, non-subscriber claims place the burden of proof on the injured worker, creating a complex and often frustrating process. At Armstrong Lee & Baker LLP, we know how overwhelming it can feel when you’re injured on the job and suddenly navigating legal obstacles without the safety net of conventional coverage. Understanding your rights is essential if you’ve been hurt while working for American Bottling Company. Non-subscriber employers face specific legal limitations, and knowing how these impact your case can make a crucial difference in how your claim is handled.

Looking for a personal injury lawyer near you in Houston, TX?

We’ll fight for the compensation you deserve.

Send Us a Message Call us

How Non-Subscriber Claims Differ From Traditional Workers’ Comp Cases

Non-subscriber claims exist because Texas law does not mandate that every employer carry workers’ compensation insurance. This creates a unique situation for companies like American Bottling Company that opt out of the system. When a workplace injury occurs, the employer cannot rely on the typical protections afforded under the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act and must instead defend itself directly in a civil lawsuit.

Unlike traditional workers’ comp, which provides automatic, no-fault medical bills and wage replacement benefits, a non-subscriber must be shown to have acted negligently. The injured employee must prove that the employer failed to maintain a safe working environment or neglected necessary training or supervision.

While this might sound intimidating, it opens the door to broader compensation. You may be entitled to recover for pain and suffering, emotional distress, and even punitive damages—forms of relief that are not available in standard workers’ comp claims. Because the legal risks are greater for non-subscribers, these employers often seek quick settlements, which can work in your favor, provided your claim is well-documented and backed by an experienced attorney.

What Defenses Are Limited in Non-Subscriber Work Injury Claims?

Texas law places clear restrictions on the defenses that non-subscriber employers can use in personal injury lawsuits filed by injured employees. These employers, having opted out of the state’s workers’ compensation system, lose access to several traditional defenses that would otherwise limit their liability in workplace injury cases. The most notable limitations relate to contributory negligence, assumption of risk, and pre-injury waivers, each of which can severely impact a worker’s ability to recover compensation in other legal contexts.

These limitations exist to protect injured workers from being unfairly disadvantaged when facing employers without workers’ comp coverage. By restricting these defenses, the law shifts the balance in favor of employees, ensuring they aren’t held solely or partially responsible for injuries caused by employer negligence.

This framework is crucial in helping injured workers assert their rights. It means that even if you played a minor role in the incident, your employer may still be fully liable. As a result, non-subscriber claims often offer workers more negotiating power when it comes to reaching a fair settlement. With these protections in place, employees have a real opportunity to pursue just compensation through litigation or settlement discussions.

Why “Contributory Negligence” May Not Apply in Your Case

Texas Labor Code §406.033 eliminates contributory negligence as a defense for non-subscribing employers. This means that if you were partially at fault for your workplace injury, your employer cannot use that fact alone to deny your right to compensation. In traditional cases, even a small percentage of fault could significantly reduce or eliminate a worker’s ability to recover damages. But non-subscriber claims shift the legal advantage toward the injured party.

For example, if you slipped on a wet floor in your workspace because your employer failed to clean it or post adequate signage, your claim may still be valid despite some shared fault. These legal protections prevent employers from using technicalities to escape liability.

Employers in these cases carry a heightened responsibility to ensure safe conditions. Even slight lapses in supervision, training, or hazard prevention can result in full liability. For injured workers, this can lead to stronger legal claims and a better chance at fair compensation through either court proceedings or negotiated settlements.

Understanding the “Assumption of Risk” Defense Limitation

Assumption of risk is a common defense used in personal injury claims to argue that the injured person accepted the dangers associated with an activity. However, Texas non-subscriber employers face significant restrictions in applying this defense in workplace injury lawsuits. According to Cornell Law School, assumption of risk can be either express or implied.

Express assumption of risk involves a written waiver, where the employee acknowledges known dangers before engaging in a task. The implied assumption of risk arises when someone voluntarily participates in an activity they understand to be dangerous.

In Texas, courts tend to disfavor this defense when the employer has opted out of the workers’ compensation system. Judges often view workplace safety as a non-transferable obligation, and public policy leans toward protecting workers rather than excusing employer negligence.

Employers still have a legal duty to ensure a reasonably safe environment. That obligation isn’t waived merely because the job carries certain inherent risks, nor is it eliminated by a waiver or implied understanding. If you were injured while performing duties under unsafe conditions, this defense likely won’t block your right to pursue compensation.

Can a Pre-Injury Waiver Bar Your Claim?

Many employers attempt to use pre-injury waivers to avoid future liability, but such agreements often do not hold up in court. According to 20 CFR §10.15, no employer may require an employee to waive their right to claim compensation under federal law. This regulation reflects a strong public policy interest in protecting workers’ rights and ensuring fair treatment when injuries occur on the job.

Even if you signed a waiver before the incident, Texas courts often deem these documents unenforceable in non-subscriber claims. The rationale is simple: employers cannot contract their way out of their responsibility to provide a safe working environment. Workers may sign waivers under pressure or without fully understanding the consequences.

If your employer is attempting to deny your claim based on a waiver, do not assume your case is over. These documents can be challenged, invalidated, and overcome with proper legal guidance, allowing you to pursue rightful compensation despite your employer’s attempts to avoid liability.

Speak With a Houston Attorney About Your American Bottling Company Work Injury Claim

Injured employees of American Bottling Company deserve to know their rights. If you’re facing resistance or confusion after a workplace injury, we can help you navigate a non-subscriber claim with confidence and precision.

At Armstrong Lee & Baker LLP, we have years of experience helping injured Texans hold non-subscriber employers accountable. Whether you’re dealing with negligence, inadequate training, or an unsafe work environment, we’re ready to stand by your side.

Contact us today at 832-402-6637 to schedule a consultation. Your path to recovery may start with a single call.

Joshua Lee

Joshua Lee believes in aggressive, tough advocacy and a client-centered approach to every case. Joshua draws from a wide body of experiences and a robust understanding of the law. Joshua graduated from the New York University School of Law in New York City, which is considered among the best law schools in the world. Our lawyers have 25+ years of combined experience.

Get in touch with Joshua Lee now.